Note editing
Written in July 2008. Public intact in September 2009.
At the time I thought it was very long and messy for publication. For those who understand English can see that the issue still haunts me enough. Many of these ideas are already changing for me. Others do not. Wanted to make public and open to dialogue this important stage of my chaotic learning.
I tell a little about the mine.
RSS
-how to organize
-what-how
leo leo
I have a very packed. More than a selection of readings is rather a mosaic to polish often. Especially since added easily. It must be that I sign up to give him the benefit of the doubt to many people.
course then need easy access to what I saved. For that I make use of folders. folders, I realize now, have a substrate ancient taxonomic to order as links in a static page. But that is our mind at first: the order in a hybrid analog world to digital yustapuesto .
My first folder to honor the taxonomic subjects and topics. All tentative, of course, because bloggers seldom deal with one issue alone. Let's say the label of the folder would be the perspective of the blogger in particular. The pair of lenses through which reality and woven filter networks. I used to read it from there, from its context.
I like to follow in my reader bloggers who write in languages \u200b\u200bother , for example, French, Italian and Portuguese. How are you taking me more time reading than English or English, I assigned a different folder. A place to open in time to overcome resistance to read more slowly or with the help of dictionaries and translators.
Some folders have the name of country of origin of blogs. Something old, yes, but it is important to have other perspectives that go beyond my life context. A learning network that points to the diversity of the world must have a bit of that world. I worry when people read a single continent.
I subscribe, of course, those bloggers I admire, however, most also many with which I disagree more what agree. The latter are central to my reading. I do not want to be in a bubble where all think alike. Read the consistent thinking helps me to articulate, to find the words to handle new constructs in my mind. It is always good not to lose sight of that question and question things you take for granted. Trying to discuss this is where they test the ideas and the ability to express them. Learn, unlearn ... stuff. Inspired me to discover the differences.
is a little difficult to calculate the time spent in my RSS. The readings are more fragmented , almost read a page of search results on Google and then choose which sites open and to pay attention.
The issue is not simply read to be informed. My RSS is not just a news daily. I intend to read that I invite you to reflect and connect to those nodes in my network who are passing similar projects. RSS is a door to dialogue, to the new post, finally, to action, perhaps a collaboration. Because after reading so if I do something with the digestion of feed that does not occur.
I would create new folders or labels to designate what I want to do with my reading. The name of my project.
Nobody has read privileges on my RSS. Each post is gained my attention. Or not. The only folder that obeys the rules folksonomy is the folder bloggers to read today. " No need to waste time in deciding to leave a subscription (the benefit to retain it for search is a topic for another post). In Google Reader is easy to see if a subscription is more than one folder. What matters is who wins the right to be in the folder of my reading priority today. Once this reading, the rest is marked as read. Quiet.
I do not care at all if I have more than 1000 articles for reading. Never occur to me to read everything. Not even if I have less than 10 open. Read is always a decision. I think it's important to resist the urge to self-imposed task to read the RSS. we will never put up with the readings . It hurts, but it is.
If new resources open the door to diversity , 2.0 is not staying on a few things I always read. We must question the relevance of some of these sites in the here and now of my projects. You may also be attentive to new voices that mark future paths of learning. For this I subscribe to some keyword searches on Technorati.
This is just so uncomfortable. Do not come to a definitive list. From the moment of reading is that always reflect what I read and what I read this or that blogger. Even decide if it's worth reading the full post (maybe another reader was written to target). And that reflection can also rise to new posts. If we propose a life-long learning or continuing every three or four months, did not have to wonder if one did not stick a little closer to the form that took, or rather disfigured, his RSS?
And now I would see if you come into your RSS?
