English, my dear colleagues and readers, is a good language 2.0. Short, colorful, and amenable to suffixation. Allows coining words that nimbly integrate both the colloquial and the academic. That the same word can be noun, adjective or verb that you can use it in so many contexts that would have to conclude that the grammatical structure of language is a code as open. What is said in the jargon, an open source architecture .
Without doubt, the synthesis of which is capable of English, not technical, Twitter's creators decided to put a limit of 140 characters. They were not thinking in English, but in the economy of Anglo-Saxon style of communication. I see this is quite disruptive to the effervescent Argentine twitterers this week look out for the first time to experience.
really enjoy seeing the tweet page and discover the talks and experiments. Some more attractive than others, but everything - and distributed, along - I love it. Funny
until yesterday when one of my colleagues, English teacher, tuitio their distress. It seems that many of those who were touched in their lack of knowledge of English and the impotence, rather than simply remove it from your contacts, blocker. Apply block to say: "I do not want to see more, or allow you to see me." It is a useful feature to stop spammers . But this is to insist that a blogger change nanoblogging your preferred language, or else ... That is to be a twitterbully ! (By the way exemplifies the plasticity of language to coin). Fea
attitude.
As my colleague was concerned that Saturday at about 12 o'clock at night, relief tweeting your Twitter account to open another in English and begins to self-impose more work to keep track leads generated, which clearly values-and thus a bad repair he never did.
temperature in degrees Twitter: -2.0
Why? Because now my colleague, overcome, gave way. And his lovely bicolor Twitter account is no more. Had no obligation to tweet in a language or another, or having to spamming translations of each tweet to order, or better expressed: management subtle. Now divided, we lose all possibility of approaching a blogger through a tinge of entries that mix the professional area with readings trivial, meal times and why not your cat sneeze, if desired. Give us an idea of \u200b\u200bthe person and their learning as a whole real-time . Of course invite encountering the new, always and necessarily a little uncomfortable. But it is precisely all this mosaic, my dear readers, the very essence of grace and much criticized Twitter.
I said and I repeat. This is not the tools. This new site is pure revolution in communication. digital literacy is plainly a change in attitude.
Had tweeting in Italian, would have said "but how cute" and French guess that would have complimented with a "what sensual." But English teachers had to be! And that, my dear readers, itchy torturous memories of past lessons and ridiculous rote methods.
who already speak it, get sticks for being a privileged, lucky or elitist. Never before someone with a victim complex who does not understand, it should be mentioned, purely by choice and not cognitive disabilities, we will recognize not one of the tabs that burned to learn. Shall I tell you a secret? You do not speak English to humiliate anyone. The reproacheth is always internal.
Those people
Autodiscriminates by jealousy of what others set out to achieve, these castaways without sinking, because the boat did not sink continuing education and is always inviting them to learn more on this wonderful web of limitless possibilities ...
For them, this is my answer:
Dare to insecurity of having no idea or theory, or prescription to tell us how to use Twitter. A little playful delivery into this world, please.
Twitter, is it a game? Well, you have to play. Now this play would have to take it more seriously. The challenges us to imagine the game open communication attitudes global, multilingual and gregarious, but distributed throughout the world.
"I imagine a lot, John?
0 comments:
Post a Comment